Friday, May 31, 2019

Smith, the amount of Smith it takes to become a Smith :: essays research papers

SOCIALSECURITY.COMThe web position for social security and retirement information. The purpose of this site is to provide up to date social security and retirement information and how to get answers to your questions. This website is a private web site and is not associated, authorized, affiliated with, or sponsored by any goverment, nor do we claim to be. Official worldwide government links for social security can be found on our questions and answers phratry located on the socialsecurity.com position page. If you have any ideas for enhancing this site or if you have any information you would like posted, please email us at webmastersocialsecurity.comPlease choose ONE of the following links1 -To receive the Social Security Benefits Handbook click here(predicate). This comprehensive guide answers many of the questions individuals assay regarding social security benefits. Easy to read. Highly informative. If you are looking to maximize your benefits, get everything you deserve a nd minimize the red tape, then this book is a must. ordering is handled through Amazon.com at a substantially discounted price. After ordering please use you browsers back button to return to this page and then click the Socialsecurity.com home page link.2 - FREE HEALTH or LIFE INSURANCE QUOTES.Its Absolutely FREE for all SocialSecurity.com users. You can even get FREE QUOTES for elevator car INSURANCE. You may get quotes for all your insurance needs. No obligation whatsoever to purchase.3 -Go to Socialsecurity.com home page.You can use your browsers back button to return here from any linked sites. REMEMBER TO BOOKMARK THIS PAGEe-stablished 3/16/98.DisclaimerDISCLAIMER This web site is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the publisher of this information is not engaged in rendering legal, or other professional services. The publisher is not responsible for any misrepresentations or errors regarding in formation listed here or on any linked sites. All information provided is for informational purposes only. We are not responsible for the faith on this information. If legal advice or other professional assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

The Trail Of Tears :: essays research papers

The Trail of Tears, was it unjust and inhumane? Whathappened to the Cherokee during that long and treacherousjourney? They were brave and listened to the presidential term,but they recieved uncreative land and lost their tribal land.The white settlers were already emigrating to the Union, orAmerica. The East coast was burdened with new settlersand becoming vastly populated. President Andrew Jacksonand the government had to find a way to move people to theWest to make room. President Andrew Jackson passed theIndian Removal Policy in the year 1830. The IndianRemoval Policy which called for the removal of NativeAmericans from the Tennessee, North Carolina, SouthCarolina, and Georgia area, also moved their capital Echotain Tennessee to the new capital call new Echota, Georgiaand then eventually to the Indian Territory. The IndianTerritory was declared in the Act of Congress in 1830 withthe Indian Removal Policy. Elias Boudinot, Major Ridge,and backside Ridge and there corps accepted the responsibilityfor the removal of one of the largest tribes in the Southeastthat were the earliest to adapt to European ways. There wasa state of war involving the Cherokee and the Chickasaw before theIndian Removal Policy was passed. The Cherokee weredefeated by them which caused Chief Dragging Canoe tosign a agreement in 1777 to split up their tribe and have theportion of the tribe in Chattanooga, Tennessee called theChickamauga. Chief Doublehead of the Chickamauga, abranch of the Cherokee, subscribe a treaty to give away theirlands. Tribal legality says "Death to any Cherokee whoproposed to sell or exchange tribal land." Chief Doubleheadwas later executed by Major Ridge. Again there wasanother treaty signed in December 29, 1835 which is calledThe Treaty of New Echota. It was signed by a party of 500Cherokee out of about 17,000. Between 1785 and 1902twenty-five treaties were signed with white men to give uptheir tribal lands. The Cherokee would find themselves in a nightmare for the next year. In 1838 General Winfield Scottgot tired of delaying this longer than the 2 years he waitedalready so he took charge in collecting the Cherokee. TheCherokee were taken from their homes and their belongings.The were placed in holding camps so none would escape.The Cherokee were to be moved in the fall of 1838. Thejourney did not occur in October, 1838 because of badweather. They were now supposed to move 13,000Cherokee in the spring of 1839 a outgo of eight-hundredmiles. The Cherokee were fed on meager rations andsuffered malnutrition. They were badly clothed for the spring

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Humor in Dickens Tale of Two Cities :: essays research papers

A Tale of Two CitiesFrequently in literature, humor is added in scenes to make them more provoke and more appealing to readers. Often times underneath the humorous covers lay a much more serious principle. Charles Dickens does exactly this in A Tale of Two Cities, by making slight comedy of issues such as democracy, the lower class, and spousal ill-treatment. In A Tale of Two Cities, the actions of Jerry Cruncher, speckle essentially very humorless, whitethorn seem peculiarly funny to some people. The events that occur in chapter one of book two, concerning Mrs. Cruncher, is an appropriate example of this idea. In this scene, Jerry Cruncher yells at his wife because he thinks she was praying against him. To start with, because of this accusations obvious ridiculousness, it strikes readers as comical. One may even argue that he didnt actually believe this, but mayhap he was just bored and finds joy in harassing his wife. To say such silly things out of boredom also may hit s omeone as amusing. What generally makes this scene humorous is that Cruncher is so unjustified in yelling at his wife for such an absurd thing, and furthermore, he lacks any real certify that she was doing what he accuses her of doing. While this scene may seem like a comical one, with a silly husband, it is really calling attention to verbal abuse to wives. It is palpable that Cruncher has no respect whatsoever for his wife. At the time of this book, this was a common situation so either people did not notice the sincerity because of the humor that is masking it, or it was an every day happenning for them. When Cruncher wakes up to find Mrs Cruncher praying (in reality praying for him), he reacts by throwing a muddy shoe at her. This ideal may also seem like a funny one to readers. Because the idea of somebody getting hit in the head by a muddy shoe can be humorous, if used in an appropriate situation, such as a TV show or a movie, it may also seem funny in this scene. The realness of the situation can be easily overlooked. When Dickens adds these unexplainable events, it may strike some as funny because his actions are so unjustified and random.

The Gay Science,by Friedrich Nietzsche :: The Gay Science, Friedrich Nietzsche

1) Nietzsche could have written The Gay Science differently. What justifies the style of composition he chose? More importantly, is his style of writing effective? What relation do you see between the style of his writing and the content of thought it expresses? Nietzsches style of writing was a deliberate stylistic choice meant to hide the meaning of his oeuvre and philosophy from those who would not be able to understand it, and finished there misunderstanding would abuse it. This writing style was also meant to help support and split up meaning to Nietzsches arguments on the nature of terminology and how row is, at its root a metaphor describing an object that is disconnected from us. Nietzsches work broke down language to its metaphorical roots and explored the nature of how our language is disconnected from the objective reality around us. Nietzsche uses the metaphorical roots of our language to show that words and language our basically disconnected because of the su bjective nature of language. Nietzsche shows these metaphorical roots by showing how simple words and phrases that we use in our everyday life be sincerely disconnected or at least removed by the barrier of language. Language is a serious of metaphors all describing how an object subjectively appears to the individual. No language can describe what it is like to be that object, nor properly describe what it is that makes the object what it is. All language can do is provide a vehicle through which reality can communicate what he is subjectively experiencing and relate it via a metaphor to another individual who will only get a radical of what is being described rather than an actual concrete description.2) In sections 124, 343, and 377, Nietzsche claims that, following the death of God, human beings find themselves in the horizon of the infinite, on the open sea, and homeless. What are the consequences of the death of God? With reference to section 347, discuss the ambiguity of this new found freedom. How might it terrify some people and empower others? The consequences for the death of paragon are far reaching and and many in Nietzsches work. Christianity sparked the death of God as most of us know him through the actions of Martin Luther. Luthers desire to give the harsh man the ability to understand and read the bible brought a end to the churches monopoly on morality and brought the divine to the common man making the common man divine.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Father and Son Essay -- essays papers

Father and SonJust whom is Edmund Gosses Father and Son written for? Is it for the Father, or for the Son, or, as Edmund Gosse tells us, for the public, so they idler have a record of life in a rigidly religious family? Edmund begins his book by telling you that it is a historical record, an important write up that is to be used, basically as a reference for a period of time. Yet, in the first directence of the first chapter, we can see that this is truly non his purpose. The first words on the page does not reference a historical event they are, instead, cathartic. Edmund tries very hard to convince his reader that this is not an story (217). Try as he might, he did not persuade me.I will grant that for Edmund Gosse to profess to have written this book as if it were a biography of his father, or even as a historical chronicle, was beneficial. First off, by committal to writing something which is to document a period of time Edmund would be writing in the methodical and s cientific style of his father, which then would mirror the lifestyle in which he is forced to live. Secondly, Edmund wants the reader to see his father as he did, with honor, awe, resentment and even shame. Edmund does this quietly, he does not shout his shame, he merely reiterates it as a anecdote of a story ...his very absence of mood aided him in his work. (113) . Finally, Edmund, being able to portray this book as a portrait of someone other than himself, is a chance to humble himself, no matter what he says about the father, to the reader. All of these methods that Edmund uses to sway our thinking actually serve only to benefit Edmund Gosse himself. This actually makes it more of an autobiographical account than ... ...ren.They are the sons and daughters of Lifes longing for itself.They come through you but not from you, and though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.You may give them your make love but not your thoughts.For they have their own thoug hts.You may house their bodies but not their souls, for their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.You may strive to be like them, but seen not to make them like you.For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forts.The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.Let your bending in the archers croak be for gladnessFor even as he loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.

Father and Son Essay -- essays papers

Father and SonJust whom is Edmund Gosses Father and Son written for? Is it for the Father, or for the Son, or, as Edmund Gosse tells us, for the public, so they can have a record of life in a rigidly religious family? Edmund begins his book by telling you that it is a historical record, an historic chronicle that is to be used, basically as a reference for a period of time. Yet, in the first sentence of the first chapter, we can see that this is real not his purpose. The first words on the page does not reference a historical event they are, instead, cathartic. Edmund tries very hard to convince his reader that this is not an autobiography (217). Try as he might, he did not persuade me.I will grant that for Edmund Gosse to profess to have written this book as if it were a biography of his father, or even as a historical chronicle, was beneficial. First off, by writing something which is to document a period of time Edmund would be writing in the methodical and scientific styl e of his father, which then would mirror the lifestyle in which he is forced to live. Secondly, Edmund wants the reader to see his father as he did, with honor, awe, resentment and even shame. Edmund does this quietly, he does not shout his shame, he merely reiterates it as a anecdote of a story ...his very absence of imagination aided him in his work. (113) . Finally, Edmund, being able to portray this book as a portrait of someone other than himself, is a chance to alter himself, no matter what he says about the father, to the reader. All of these methods that Edmund uses to sway our thinking actually serve only to benefit Edmund Gosse himself. This actually makes it more of an autobiographical government note than ... ...ren.They are the sons and daughters of Lifes longing for itself.They come through you but not from you, and though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.You may place them your love but not your thoughts.For they have their own thoughts .You may house their bodies but not their souls, for their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.You may strive to be like them, but seen not to make them like you.For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forts.The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.Let your bending in the archers hand be for gladnessFor even as he loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.